SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 110

THANIKKACHALAM, JAYARAMA CHOUTA
J. Abdur Rahim and Company – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:N. Inbarajan, A.K. Gopinath, Advocates.

Judgment :-

THANIKKACHALAM, J.

The assessee is the petitioner. The assessee is the dealer in dressed skins. The assessee claimed exemption on purchases in wattle extract amounting to Rs. 1, 12, 799.93, effected through the All India Skin and Hide Tanners and Merchants Association. The assessee contended that the assessee is entitled to exemption claimed in respect of purchase through the All India Skin and Hide Tanners and Merchants Association (hereinafter referred to as "the Association") in view of the certificate dated March 3, 1984, issued by the association. The assessing officer held that the abovesaid association is not an agent of the assessee and the assessee is the last purchaser and the consumer. Therefore, a sum of Rs. 1, 12, 799.93 is assessable at 2 per cent. Aggrieved with the same, the assessee filed an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. According to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, since the purchases could not be linked with any earlier written contract, the assessing officer was correct in levying taxes on Rs. 1, 12, 799.93, especially, according to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner when there is no evidence to show that the said associat

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top