SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 25

SRINIVASAN
Bush Boake Allen (India) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Habibullah Badsha, B.S. Govindan, K. Jayachanan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This writ petition can be disposed of on a very short ground. The petitioners are manufacturing among other things, flavouring essences for edible food products. Notification No. 55/75-C.E., dated 1-3-1975 exempted certain goods specified in the Schedule and falling under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon. The first item mentioned therein is `all kinds of food products and food preparations' including six items specified therein. It is not necessary for me to refer to those items which are included. It is sufficient to note that all kinds of food products are exempted under the notification.

2.By Letter dated 11-8-1975 in C. No. V/68/30/21/75, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras IV Division issued a notice to the petitioners to show cause why flavouring essences for edible food products should not be classified as non-food products assessable to duty under Item No. 68 of the C.E. Tariff. The Assistant Collector rejected the contention of the petitioners that they would fall under the expression `food products' and passed an order. The petitioners filed an appeal










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top