SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 474

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K. A. SWAMI AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJU
V. Premanand - Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu and Others - Respondents
W. No. 339 of 1995
Decided On : 27 April 1995

Appearing Advocates:S. Subramanian, D. Rajagopal, D. Murugesan, Advocates.

The procedure prescribed for obtaining a certificate to prove eligibility for a reserved category seat is intended to eliminate ineligible persons from taking undue advantage, and not to defeat the substantive right of those who genuinely belong to the category.

Headnote:

INTER-CASTE MARRIAGE - ADMISSION TO MEDICAL COURSE - RESERVATION FOR CHILDREN BORN OF INTER-CASTE MARRIAGE - PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATE - REJECTION OF APPLICATION FOR WANT OF CERTIFICATE - ARBITRARY - DIRECTION TO ADMIT THE PETITIONER TO THE COURSE.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, born of an inter-caste marriage between a scheduled caste/ scheduled tribe and a forward community, applied for admission to the I Year MBBS Course for the Academic Year 1994-95 Session under the special category reserved for children born of inter-caste marriage. He had secured marks above the eligibility criteria and more than many of the candidates admitted in the three categories of inter-caste marriage. However, his application was rejected by the Selection Committee for not submitting the certificate from the Tahsildar regarding the castes of the parents along with the application, as required by the prospectus.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Selection Committee acted arbitrarily in rejecting the petitioner's application solely on the ground that the certificate from the Tahsildar was not produced along with the application. The court observed that the procedure prescribed in the prospectus was intended to eliminate persons who did not belong to the category from taking undue advantage, and not to defeat the substantive right of those who genuinely belonged to the category.

Issues: Whether the petitioner, who belongs to the category of children born of inter-caste marriage between S.C./S.T. and Forward Community, is entitled to admission to the seats reserved for children born of inter-caste marriage, even though he did not produce the certificate from the Tahsildar along with the application.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that as long as the petitioner belonged to the category of children born of inter-caste marriage between S.C./S.T. and Forward Community and was able to produce the certificate before the application was scrutinised for admission, the Selection Committee could not refuse to consider his application only on the ground that the certificate was not produced along with the application. The court observed that the procedure is intended to facilitate enforcement of substantive right and not to defeat the substantive right.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ appeal, set aside the order of the single judge, and directed the respondents to admit the petitioner to the I Year of MBBS Course for the academic year 1994-95 before the close of the academic year.

Judgment :-

K. A. SWAMI, C.J.

This appeal is preferred against the order dated 16-3-1995 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition 19008 of 1994. The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to select and appoint him to the I Year MBBS Course for the Academic Year 1994-95 Session under the special category reserved for children born of inter-caste marriage. Learned single Judge has disposed of the writ petition with a direction that the petitioner should be provided a seat from the academic year 1995-96. Hence, the petitioners has come up in appeal.

2. Facts necessary for the purpose of adjudicating as to whether the petitioner is entitled to the relief sought for in the writ petition, are no more in dispute. The petitioner is born of an inter-caste marriage between a scheduled caste/ scheduled tribe and a forward community. The State Government in order to encourage inter-caste marriage and that too between a member of scheduled caste/ scheduled tribe and forward community, has reserved certain seats in educational institutions for the children born of inter-caste marriage. As per clause 3.5(viii) of the prospectus issued by the Directorate of Medical Education, Tamil Nadu, for the professional courses in Tamil Nadu in Medical and Pharmaceutical for the academic year 1994-95, 12 seats are reserved for children born of inter-caste marriages. Preference is also provided according to the nature of the nature of the inter-caste marriage. That preference is as follows :

"Candidates claiming admission against the reservation for the children born of inter-caste marriage should submit a certificate from the Tahsildar of the respective area regarding the castes of the parents, vide G.O.Ms. No. 477, Social Welfare Department, dated 27-6-1995. The following order of preference shall be followed for selection of candidates from the category.

(a) The children born of inter-caste marriage between S.C./S.T. and forward communities.

(b) The children born of inter-caste marriage between S.C./ S.T. and backward class communities.

{e) The children born of inter-caste marriage between S.C./S.T. and most backward class and denotified communities." *

As already pointed out, the petitioner falls in the first category, viz., children born of inter-caste marriage between S.C./S.T. and forward community, therefore, he will have preference over other two categories. In addition to this, it is also not in dispute that the petitioner has secured the marks not only above the marks fixed for eligibility but more marks than many of the candidates admitted in the aforesaid three categories. He had filed the application within time and had also mentioned in the application that he was born of inter-caste marriage between S.C./S.T. and forward community. However, in the application, he had mentioned that he had applied for a certificate from the Tahsildar and the same had not yet been issued and the same will be produced as soon as it is issued. He was able to produce such certificate before the Selection Committee considered the applications for admission relating to the special category in question.

3. However, the Selection Committee has rejected the application relying upon cl. 13.5 of the Prospectus, which states that the candidates seeking admission against special category seats should submit necessary certificates obtained from appropriate authorities in the prescribed form and submit them along with the application to the Selection Committee in the form prescribed. It is true that along with the application, the petitioner was not able to produce the certificate, but, nevertheless, he mentioned that such a certificate had been sought for and the same would be furnished as soon as it is issued.

4. The point for consideration is as to whether it is the undisputed fact that the candidate belonging to the category of children born of inter-caste marriage between S.C./S.T. and Forward Community, determines his right for selection to the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top