SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 514

ABDUL HADI, VENKATACHALAM
Greaves Chitram Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:C. Natarajan, Mrs. Chitra Venkataraman, Advocates.

Judgment :-

ABDUL HADI, J.

The assessee, who has failed before all the authorities below, has preferred this revision under section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The turnover no doubt relates to inter-State sale coming under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the relevant assessment year is 1983-84.

2. The only question is whether the transportation charges to the extent of Rs. 2, 00, 000 and the insurance charges to the extent of Rs. 20, 000 from part of the "sale price" as defined under section2(h) of the Central Sales Tax Act.

The assessee sold a crane to its purchaser for a total consideration of Rs. 21, 63, 675 which included the abovesaid two figures also, that is one for transpiration and another for insurance. All the authorities below have concurrently held that the abovesaid Rs. 2, 00, 000 representing charges and Rs. 20, 000 representing the insurance charges from part of the sale price. But, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the authorities below including the Tribunal have erred in holding that there abovesaid transportation charges and insurance charges form part of the sale price and in assess



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top