SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 547

THANIKKACHALAM
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
N. K. Chinnasamy and Company and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Mrs. Chitra Venkataraman, N. Inbarajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

THANIKKACHALAM, J.

These tax case revisions relate to the three assessment years, viz., 1973-74, 1974-75 and 1975-76. There are four assesses in these five tax case revisions. The question arising in all these tax revision cases is common. Hence, they are taken up together for the sake of convenience. The common question that arises for consideration in all these tax revision cases is whether the goods have already suffered tax in the hands of the sellers.

2. Exemption was claimed by the assessees on the purchase turnovers involved in the revisions and the exemption sought for was granted on the ground that the purchases were second purchases in the hands of the assessees. Groundnut kernel is taxable at the point of the first purchase as single point goods. The assessing officer on verification has found that the exemption granted on the said purchase turnover on the said ground is not correct. According to the assessing officer, the Alangudi dealers are mere decorticators and they are not the dealers as defined under the relevant provisions of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (in short, "the Act"). In fact they are not the owners of the groundnut kernel purchas






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top