SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 555

N.ARUMUGHAM
Vadivel – Appellant
Versus
Packialakshmi – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Miss Latha, Angayarkanni, P. Kulandai Vadivelu, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The first accused before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri in C.C. No. 31 of 198, tried upon a private complaint for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code along with two others, who was convicted for the offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, felt aggrieved by the judgement dated 30-8-89 canvasses the same for want of legality, propriety and validity in this criminal revision

2. On 20-1-1982 at Moonumothemmozhi in Nagarcoil District the revison petitioner being the first accused, along with his wife second accused, by name Bakiathai, approached P.W.1 Bagialakshmi to get a gold chain weighing about five sovereigns and another chain weighing about 2 1/2 sovereigns to attend a marriage of their near relative in some other village by giving an assurance to the respondent to return the jewels after attending the marriage and on such representation they made the said Bagialakshmi to part with the jewels and thereafter, they never returned the same as promised. But, later they pledged the said jewellery in the bank as if they belonged to them. Even after, repeated demand and requests they deliberately failed to redeem and return
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top