N.ARUMUGHAM
Vadivel – Appellant
Versus
Packialakshmi – Respondent
The first accused before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri in C.C. No. 31 of 198, tried upon a private complaint for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code along with two others, who was convicted for the offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, felt aggrieved by the judgement dated 30-8-89 canvasses the same for want of legality, propriety and validity in this criminal revision
2. On 20-1-1982 at Moonumothemmozhi in Nagarcoil District the revison petitioner being the first accused, along with his wife second accused, by name Bakiathai, approached P.W.1 Bagialakshmi to get a gold chain weighing about five sovereigns and another chain weighing about 2 1/2 sovereigns to attend a marriage of their near relative in some other village by giving an assurance to the respondent to return the jewels after attending the marriage and on such representation they made the said Bagialakshmi to part with the jewels and thereafter, they never returned the same as promised. But, later they pledged the said jewellery in the bank as if they belonged to them. Even after, repeated demand and requests they deliberately failed to redeem and return
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.