SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 666

A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Sankaranarayanan – Appellant
Versus
Palaniswami – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:P. Peppin Fernando, G. Nagarajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The landlord is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. He filed R.C.O.P. No.9 of 1987 on the file of the Rent Controller/District Munsiff, Tenkasi, for evicting the respondent/tenant from the property bearing Door No.354 situated in Ward No.15, Kadayanallur Municipality, originally belonged to one S. Esakki Chettiar The respondent took the property on lease from the said S. Esakki Chettiar for running a business on a monthly rent of Rs. 45/-. The petitioner obtained an Othi of the property on 10-12-1986 from the said S. Esakki Chettiar under Ex. A-1. The petitioner has been running a business in Door No.354 in Ward No.15 in a building belonging to one Kulathurammal, who wanted the petitioner to surrender the leasehold property. She had also issued notice demanding possession of the same from him. The petitioner as the Othidar is entitled to maintain the petition for eviction since he requires the building to run his business.

2. The respondent/tenant resisted the petition for eviction. According to him, the petition is a vexatious one and that the owner of the premises viz., S. Esakki Chettiar, who wanted to evict the respondent from the petition premises, tried















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top