N.ARUMUGHAM
Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
Veerapandian and Others – Respondent
Petitioner Ranganathan, examined P. W. 15 before the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Chengalput, in Sessions Case No. 225 of 1988, father of deceased by name Mandothari, has come forward with this revision, challenging the propriety and legality of the Judgment rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Chengalput, in C.A. No. 11 of 1990 on 25-1-1991, setting aside the judgment of conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Chengalput, and acquitting the respondents 1 to 3 herein of all the charges. Respondents 1 to 3 herein were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and 304(B) I.P.C. before the trial Court. On finding the respondents 1 to 3 accused guilty of the charges, the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, convicted and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence under Section 498(A) I.P.C. and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years for the offence under section 304(B) I.P.C. and ordered the sentence to run concurrently
2.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.