SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 737

N.ARUMUGHAM
Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
Veerapandian and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Mr. S. Ashok Kumar, Mr. V. Gopinath, Mr. A. N. Rajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Petitioner Ranganathan, examined P. W. 15 before the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Chengalput, in Sessions Case No. 225 of 1988, father of deceased by name Mandothari, has come forward with this revision, challenging the propriety and legality of the Judgment rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Chengalput, in C.A. No. 11 of 1990 on 25-1-1991, setting aside the judgment of conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Chengalput, and acquitting the respondents 1 to 3 herein of all the charges. Respondents 1 to 3 herein were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) and 304(B) I.P.C. before the trial Court. On finding the respondents 1 to 3 accused guilty of the charges, the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, convicted and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence under Section 498(A) I.P.C. and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years for the offence under section 304(B) I.P.C. and ordered the sentence to run concurrently

2.





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top