SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 917

JAYASIMHA BABU
Vijayalakshmi Art Productions – Appellant
Versus
Vijaya Productions Private Limited – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Dulip Singh, T. Raghavan, T. K. Seshadri, Advocates.

Judgment :-

JAYASIMHA BABU J.

This is a petition for the winding up of the respondent company under section 433(e) and (f) read with sections 434(a) and 439(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956. This petition was filed on April 8, 1994. The question of limitation looms large in this petition. The petitioner, Sri Vijayalakshmi Art Productions, a registered partnership firm, claims to have advanced to the respondent company between July 2, 1985, and March 8, 1990, large sums of money aggregating to Rs. 71, 00, 000. The petitioner has stated that the said sums were advanced at the request of the respondent and were to carry interest at mutually agreed rates. The petitioner has, at para 5 of the petition stated :

"The receipt of the above loan was acknowledged by the respondent under various correspondence, the last of which is dated January 21, 1994, by the respondent's chartered accountant on behalf of the respondent company, and by one of the directors of the respondent company on January 24, 1994. Curiously in letter dated January 24, 1994, the respondent company confirmed only a sum of Rs. 19, 03, 500 standing to the credit of the petitioner in the respondents' books of account. Needle


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top