SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 947

N.ARUMUGHAM
Benedict Balanathan Mahendran Alias Bala Mahendran and Another – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:A. Natarajan, A. N. Rajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Concurrent Judgments of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Madras in C.A. No. 146 of 1985, dated 29-7-1986 and the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Madras, in C.C. No. 665 of 1982, finding both the revision Petitioners guilty for the offences under Sections 419, 420 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12(1) (b) of the passports Act and consequently, sentencing both of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four months on all the four counts concurrently, are being canvassed in this Revision for want of legality, propriety and correctness

2. Both the Petitioners who are husband and wife and Sri Lankan Nationals in origin, stood charged and tried by the trial Court for the offences under Sections 419, 420 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12(1)(b) of the passports Act. The first petitioner is stated to be Popular for his talent, excellence in cine photography and his being cine director and the second petitioner, his wife, is also stated to be in the Cinema field, but to a limited extent, in helping her husband with dance performances and so on. It is stated that the first petitioner was born on 20-5-1939 in Navaly, Jaffna D
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top