SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 249

PRATAP SINGH
S. Muthu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:S. Kanaga Sabai, Advocate. For the Respondent:K. Raja, Govt. Advocate.

Judgment :-

The accused concerned in Cr. No. 404/91 of the respondent Police Station has filed this petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. Praying to call for the records in the above case and quash the same.

2. Short facts are :- One Devadoss gave the First Information Report before the respondent Police. The allegations in it are briefly as follows :-

The complainant is doing business under the name and style of Devadoss Family Aid Corporation at Tirunelveli. On 3-4-1991, the accused purchased goods for a sum of Rs. 68,224/-. In spite of the fact that he had not arranged for payment of as much amount, he issued cheque on 3-4-91, post dating it as 3-6-1991. Because of the false representation that the cheque will be honoured in due course, the complainant gave him goods on credit basis on 3-4-91. Thus the accused has fraudulently and dishonestly induced the complainant to deliver goods to him on the pretext of issuing the said cheque knowing fully well that cheque will not be honoured. The accused has committed an offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C. This first Information Report given by the said Devadoss was registered in Cr. No. 404/91 of the respondent Police Station for of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top