SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 485

SOMASUNDARAM, K.A.SWAMI
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
Gunasundari Modern Art Printers – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Mrs. Chitra Venkataraman, Advocates.

Judgment :-

K. A. SWAMY, C.J.

Following the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Tamil Nadu v. Anandam Viswanathan the Appellate Tribunal has set aside the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in part and confirmed the order in so far as it related to levy of penalty on the turnover equal to the tax as the appellant did not disclose the turnover in the returns.

2. It is contended before us that the Tribunal is not right in holding that the printing of certain account books by the assessee for the Indian Bank, amounts to works contract, whereas the assessee has used the paper for the purpose of printing and to the extent of the value of the paper it becomes a sale of paper. Even otherwise, it is contended that what is sold is printed material and, therefore, there is a sale of the printed material and such sale becomes liable to sales tax. Under similar circumstances in the aforesaid case, the Supreme Court has held that such printed material has no commercial value, in the sense it cannot be sold in the market to any other person. The same proposition will apply to the case on hand, because the books printed by the assessee on the order placed by the Indian Bank, cannot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top