SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 725

S.M.ALI MOHAMED
Nithya – Appellant
Versus
University of Madras, and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:R. Gandhi, N. Paul Vasanthakumar, S.K. Geetha, Advocates.

Judgment :-

By consent of parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioner herein is a student of the Ethiraj College for Women, Madras for B.A. Corporate Secretaryship (Evening Class) Three Years Course from 1991-92 to 1993-94. For the final academic year, that is; 1993-94, she has completed. 55.75% of attendance. However, due to the fact that she was married on 18-10-1993 and shortly thereafter, she was conceived and as such she was suffering from morning sickness and was indisposed due to nausea throughout the day, she was not able to attend the college regularly. In the meantime, as the final year examination of three years course commenced on 8-4-1994, she approached the third respondent - the Principal, Ethiraj College for Women on 6-4-1994 to write the examinations. But, she was informed that her hall ticket was withheld. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has approached this Court for a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the third respondent pertaining to the letter dt. 6-4-1994 impugned in this writ petition and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to si








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top