SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Mad) 396

BAKTHAVATSALAM
Dr. A. Indira Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
Government of India and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:M. Krishnappan, V. Prakash, Advocates.

Judgment :-

BAKTHAVATSALAM J.

The prayer in this writ petition is as follows : ... to issue a writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ, prohibiting the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madras, the second respondent herein, from proceeding with the complaint given by the third respondent herein in O. P. No. 50 of 1992 taken on its file and pass.

The petitioner, who is a medical practitioner has come before this court with this writ petition, when the third respondent filed O. P. No. 50 of 1992 before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. During June, 1988, it seems that the wife of the third respondent, Smt. Indira, was admitted in the Murari Hospital with labour pain. The Murari Hospital, where the petitioner was working, was run by a society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act. Since the wife of the third respondent did not deliver till late in the evening (on June 17, 1988), the petitioner thought of applying forceps and the child was delivered at 9.50 p.m. by the use of forceps. It was then found out that the child had its left eye lying outside. It seems that the petitioner immedi













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top