K. A. SWAMI, C.J. :-

This writ appeal is preferred against the order dated July 19, 1993, passed by the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 12976 of 1993. At the state of admission of the writ appeal, the respondent is notified. Accordingly, he is represented through a counsel. Hence, the writ appeal is heard for final disposal.

2. In the writ petition, the petitioner-appellant sought for quashing the order dated June 28, 1993 passed by the respondent in his proceedings bearing No. 51-8718/11 INETV, directing the petitioner-appellant to pay the contribution in respect of certain employees, as stated in the impugned order. The respondent, in all, demanded a sum of Rs. 21, 803.79. The learned single Judge has rejected, the writ petition on the ground that it is open to the petitioner-appellant to approach the Court under Sec. 75 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Therefore, the learned single Judge has held that no interference is called for in the exercise of jurisdiction under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the appellant/petitioner that the impugned order has been issued without following t