SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Mad) 88

S.NAINAR SUNDARAM
Op Bank Employees Union Etc – Appellant
Versus
Tiruchirapalli Hirudayapuram Co-Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Tiruchirapalli Etc. – Respondent


Appearing Advocates: For

Judgment :-

Nainar Sundaram, Ag. CJ.

There are certain broad features common to these cases. There may be features peculiar and distinct to some of these cases, but they have no relevance at all for purpose of deciding the question that gets posed before us. There were settlements arrived at in the course of conciliation proceeding and otherwise than in the course of conciliation proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', fitting in with Sections 12(3) and 18(1) of the Act, as the cases may be. All the formalities regarding such settlements, as per the pre-requisites of the Act, have been satisfied. The settlements were between the concerned co-operative societies on the one hand and their employees on the other. The settlements concerned the wages structures for the employees in the Cooperative societies. In the settlements, the Cooperative societies were represented by the office bearers of the elected bodies who were in charge of the management of the co-operative societies. Only subsequently, the elected bodies have been dislodged and special officers have come into the picture. The contesting respondents raise ascertain queries co



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top