A.R.LAKSHMANAN
S. P. Dhandapani Pondicherry – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Authority and Others, Respondants – Respondent
The Order of the Court was as follows :
The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to call for the records in F. No. TD/TP. 1/11/92 dated 4-3-1992 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and for any other appropriate order or direction.
2. The petitioner's grievance is that in spite of the fact that his permit on the route Cuddalore to Tindivanam was directed to be renewed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Pondicherry, the 1st respondent, in spite of his repeated requests, did not make the necesssary endorsement of the said renewal in his stage carriage permit effecting the renewal from 4-1-1988 to 4-1-1993. According to the writ petitioner, his permit alone for the Inter-State route Cuddalore to Tindivanam via Pondicherry is covered by the Inter-State agreement for the portions lying within the limits of Union Territory of Pondicherry. But, suddenly, by proceedings dated 4-3-1992, the 1st respondent, purporting to implement the order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Pondicherry, in M.V. Appeal No. 1 of 1992, renewing his stage carriage permit on the route Cuddalore to Tindivanam via Pondicherry, stated that the renewal is given subje
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.