SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Mad) 471

SWAMIDURAI
Kamakshi – Appellant
Versus
Jugraj Jain – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:S. Swaminathan, Himmatmal Mardia, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Judgment was delivered by :

This appeal arises as against the order made in I.A. No. 14298 of 1989 on the file of the learned Third Assistant City Civil Judge, Madras. I.A. No. 14298/89 was filed under Order 9, Rule 13, C.P.C. by the petitioner/defendant for setting aside the ex parte decree made in the suit. The suit is for delivery of vacant possession of suit property, namely, house and premises bearing Door No. 24, Munuswamy Achari Street, Perambur, Madras 11 to the plaintiff/respondent herein and for directing the defendant/petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs. 12, 600/- towards past mesne profits with interest at 12% P.A. from the date of the plaint till the date of realisation and also future mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 350/- per month from the date of the plaint till the date of delivery of vacant possession.

2. The respondent herein is a purchaser of the suit property in an auction held under the powers conferred upon the original mortgagee under Section 69-A of the Transfer of Property Act. The respondent, after getting the sale deed in his favour, filed the suit for possession and for other reliefs as stated above. The petitioner herein as defendant fi































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top