SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 108

JANARTHANAM
Ravichandran – Appellant
Versus
Mariyammal – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:K. Ramachandran, Advocate. For the Respondent:K. Srinivasan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

Ravinchandran (petitioner) is the accused in C.C. No. 471 of 1986 on the file of Judicial II Class Magistrate, Sirkali.

2. The succinct facts leading to the filing of the petition are :- Mariyammal, respondent herein, is unmarried. The respondent is living with her parents at Kattunaicken street, Vaitheeswarnkoil. Her father is owing a store dealing with articles required for the purpose of pooja to deities. Opposite to the shop, one Ravinchandran, the petitioner/accused is also owning - a shop transacting the same business. The respondent used to assist her brother in the shop. In that process, she came into contact with the petitioner and in due course of time, a bondage of love got solemnised between them. They were moving like that for about 3 years. It is alleged that the petitioner made persistent efforts to enjoy her blissful company, even prior to their marriage. She appeared to have been evading such request all along. On 18-1-1985 at about 9.00 a.m. the petitioner was said to have made a representation, in the shape of promise that he would marry her in due course and made her accept his request of sharing bed together, at the garden situate behind Samiyar Mad













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top