ARUMUGHAM
Union Bank of India, Ennorc Branch, represented by its Branch Manager – Appellant
Versus
S. Paval and others – Respondent
The suit is for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,01,697.25 with future interest per annum against the first defendant, for a mortgage decree against the defendants for the said amount and for a personal decree against the defendants 2 to 4 for amount with subsequent interest and costs.
2. The substance of the plaintiffs case as gathered from the plaint is as follows: The plaintiff is a Bank constituted under Central Act 5 of 1970, having its head Bombay with the several branches throughout the country and among which, a Ennore, Saidapet Taluk, Chengalpattu District, is being represented by its Principal and Manager. The first defendant being the fisherman, approached the plaintiff for of loan under the finance programme to his business in fishing, particularly for purchasing fishing boat and that for the said loan, the defendants 2 to 4 who were also doing business, undertook to repay the loan to be granted to the first defendant and that they deposited title deeds on 17.1.1977 of their property situate in Door No.80, Colony, Royapuram, Madras, with the intention of creating a security over the said for the loan to be advanced to the first defendant. Accordingly a sum of Rs.58
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.