SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 134

SRINIVASAN
Ramachandran and others – Appellant
Versus
Valliammal and others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:S.Sampath Kumar, for Appellants. M.N.Padmanabhan, for Respondents.

Judgment :-

Defendants 1 to 3 are the appellants before me. Respondents 1 and 2 suit for declaration of the title of the 1st plaintiff to the suit property and also declaration that the 2nd plaintiff is a lessee of the 1st plaintiff in respect of the suit under the registered lease deed dated 7.1.1975. They also prayed for an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession. Subsequently, they prayed for an alternative relief of recovery of possession by amending the plaint.

2. The case set out in the plaint is shortly as follows: The suit property originally belonged Muthial Animal, mother of the 1st plaintiff by purchase under a registered sale deed 25.4.1932 executed by one Ramaswamy Maistry. She was in possession till her death about 1950. On her death, the property devolved on the 1st plaintiff and as she was away from the suit village after her marriage, the properties were entrusted to certain persons, who were cultivating the same on her behalf. The 2nd plaintiff started cultivation a lessee under the 1st plaintiff from about 1969 under a machalika and on 7.1.1975 a deed was executed and registered in favour of the 2nd plaintiff. The 1st defendan


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top