SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 213

BAKTHAVATSALAM
L. Sundararajan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:R. Muthukumaraswamy, M. Muthappan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The petitioner challenges an order passed by the Government rejecting his revision petition and granting a "No Objection Certificate" to the fourth respondent to locate a touring cinema in S. No. 513 /1 (Part), 513 / 2 (part) and 517 (Part) of Avaniapuram Village, Madurai South Taluk.

2. Originally the fourth respondent applied to third respondent for the grant of a 'No Objection Certificate' to locate a touring cinema in S. Nos. 513/1 (Part), 513/2 (Part) and 517 (Part) of Avaniapuram Village, Madurai South Taluk. That application was rejected. On appeal to the second respondent, the order of the third respondent (Collector) was set aside and the second respondent granted the 'No Objection Certificate' in favour of the fourth respondent. Against that, the petitioner preferred a revision to the Government which has been rejected.

3. The petitioner alleges in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that he is the licensee of an existing touring cinema in Thirupparankundram and the site preferred by the fourth respondent for locating a touring cinema is very near the petitioner's theatre and is totally unfit for locating a cinema theatre. He also alleges that th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top