SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 219

VENKATASWAMY
V. Shanmugham and Another – Appellant
Versus
Messrs Carona Sahu Company Limited, Bombay – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:S. Jagadeesan, T. R. Rajagopalan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The short question that arises for consideration in this Civil Revision Petition is, whether the purchaser of a building pending disposal of the revision petition in this court against an eviction order is entitled to execute the decree for eviction notwithstanding the fact that the purchaser has not been brought on record before the final disposal of the revision petition.

2. The petitioners herein have purchased the suit premises on 29-12-1984 under a registered sale deed from one Thajudeen. The original owner, namely, Thajudeen had filed R.C.O.P. No. 90 of 1976, on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif), Salem, for eviction of the tenant (respondents herein) on the ground of wilful default in payment of rents and obtained an order of eviction. The appeal filed against the order of eviction was also dismissed. The tenant further preferred a civil revision petition in this Court in C.R.P. No. 2076 of 1983. When the C.R.P. was pending, the petitioners herein purchased the suit premises. It is common ground that immediately after purchase, tenant attorned the tenancy in favour of the petitioners herein and have been paying rents to the petitioners. However, the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top