This civil revision petition is filed by the unsuccessful landlady in rent control proceedings.

2. Brief facts are the following: The petitioner herein purchased the suit premises from Ramasami Chettiar on 14.11.1979. Thereafter, since no rents were paid, a notice demanding rents for the period from November, 1979 to January, 1981 was sent by the petitioner respondent. In reply to this notice, the respondent has stated inter alia that what was let was only a site. The respondent has paid a sum of Rs.5,000 by way of advance to vendor of the petitioner, that a sum of Rs.1,400 has been paid towards property tax, the vendor has agreed to adjust the said amount from the rents payable by her. According to the respondent, there was no default in payment of rents. It may be mentioned that the notice was issued by the petitioner, by mistake, rents were demanded from respondent from 1.11.1978. While issuing a rejoinder to the reply sent by the respondent, the petitioner has corrected the period of demand as from November, 1979 to the date issue of rejoinder. The petitioner acknowledged the payment of Rs.5,000 towards advance the vendor. However, the petitioner denied the claim of