SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 561

A.S.ANAND, KANAKARAJ
Associated Agencies – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:R. Gangadharan, D. Srinivasan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

DR. A. S. ANAND, C.J.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Joint Commissioner, dated January 18, 1982, passed in exercise of the suo motu powers of revision under section34 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter called "the Act").

2. The assessee is a dealer at Ooty, who reported a total and taxable turnover of Rs. 37, 26, 524.07 and Rs. 20, 92, 487.99, respectively for the assessment year 1975-76. Exemption was claimed on a turnover of Rs. 3, 01, 465.38 representing second sales of "Gramoxone". The assessing authority disallowed the claim of exemption holding that the commodity "Gramoxone" comes under "weedicides" which were liable at 4 per cent. multi-point tax. After noticing certain other defects also the accounts of the assessee had been rejected and recourse was had to best of judgment assessment. The assessing authority, accordingly, estimated the total and taxable turnover of the assessee at Rs. 34, 39, 567.12 and Rs. 23, 11, 213.35, respectively. Additional tax and surcharge were also levied on the above turnover at the prescribed rates. The assessee went up in appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Coi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top