SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 640

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJU
K. P. Zainulabdeen and Others - Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Madras and Others - Respondents
Writ Petn. No. 1808 of 1983
Decided On : 06 September 1991

Appearing Advocates:Hajee P. K. Jamal Mohammed, K. N. Badsha, S. Gopalaratnam, R. L. Ramani, Advocates.

The Board has the power to appoint an Enquiry Committee to conduct an inquiry into the management of a wakf under Section 45(1)(b) of the Wakf Act.

Headnote:

WAKF - REMOVAL OF MUTHAVALLIS - MISMANAGEMENT - ENQUIRY COMMITTEE - APPOINTMENT - POWER OF THE BOARD - PROCEDURE - NATURAL JUSTICE - PRINCIPLES - VIOLATION - ACTS OF MISMANAGEMENT - SUFFICIENCY OF MATERIALS - INDIVIDUAL INDICTMENT - NECESSITY - SUCCESSION CLAIMS - PREMATURITY.

Fact of the Case:

A wakf deed created in 1919 dedicated certain properties and cash for various charitable purposes. After the death of the founder and his sons, the grandsons managed the wakf. An application was filed before the Wakf Board alleging mismanagement and irregularities by the grandsons. The Board appointed an Enquiry Committee, which found that the Muthavallis had failed to perform the charitable acts and had committed irregularities. The Board removed the Muthavallis and took over the management of the wakf for one year.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Board had the power to appoint an Enquiry Committee to conduct an inquiry into the management of the wakf. The court also held that the petitioners were given sufficient opportunity to defend themselves and that the principles of natural justice were not violated. The court further held that the materials on record were sufficient to justify the removal of the Muthavallis and the assumption of direct control and management of the wakf by the Board.

Issues: 1. Whether the Board had the power to appoint an Enquiry Committee to conduct an inquiry into the management of the wakf? 2. Whether the petitioners were given sufficient opportunity to defend themselves and whether the principles of natural justice were violated? 3. Whether the materials on record were sufficient to justify the removal of the Muthavallis and the assumption of direct control and management of the wakf by the Board?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the Board had the power to appoint an Enquiry Committee to conduct an inquiry into the management of the wakf under Section 45(1)(b) of the Wakf Act. The court held that the Committee was constituted to gather the necessary materials to enable the Board to proceed with the consideration of the matter further and that the Board had not abdicated its powers in favor of the Enquiry Committee. 2. The court held that the petitioners were given sufficient opportunity to defend themselves and that the principles of natural justice were not violated. The court noted that the petitioners had participated in the inquiry and the hearings before the Board with full knowledge of the report of the Enquiry Committee and that they had not raised any grievance regarding lack of opportunity or non-furnishing of the report. 3. The court held that the materials on record were sufficient to justify the removal of the Muthavallis and the assumption of direct control and management of the wakf by the Board. The court noted that the petitioners had failed to perform the charitable acts specified in the wakf deed, had committed irregularities, and had mismanaged the wakf properties.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Muthavallis challenging the order of the Board removing them from office and taking over the management of the wakf.

Judgment :-

The above Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari to call for and quash the orders of the first respondent in W.A. No. 10/B. 7/72/Try dated 23-12-1982.

2. Philanthropist by name Janab Khader Mohideen alies Chinnatha Rowther of Aravakurichi, Karur Taluk, Trichy District said to have created a wakf deed dated 5-9-1919 dedicating certain properties and cash of Rs. 1, 500/- for the following objects :-

"(1) To run the Madrasa, Madrasathul Muhammedia established by the founder of the Wakf in 1903.

(2) To provide books to the poor students of the said Madrasa.

(3) To provide for the funeral expenses of the poor.

(4) To provide for the expenses of Haj Pilgrims.

(5) To provide for the marriage expenses of poor girls.

(6) To provide for the Ramzan Musafirs.

(7) To provide for recitation of moulood and for feeding miskeens (poor) during the Muharram, Rabiul Avval, Rabiul Akir, Jamathul Akhir and Rajab months." *

According to the wakf deed, it appears that the founder appointed himself as the first Muthavalli of the wakf till his lifetime and further provided that thereafter his eldest son should be the Executive Muthavalli and the other sons were to function as ordinary Muthavallis. After the lifetime of the sons, the eldest grand-son or sons through each of their family should be the Muthavallis and if any of them alienated or attempted to alienate the properties given under the wakf or mismanaged the wakf, they should be removed from the management of the wakf. Admittedly, the original wakf, died in the year 1939 and his eldest son died in 1960. The other sons are said to have pre-deceased the eldest son.

According to the petitioners, after the death of the eldest son, the petitioners and 5 other grandsons were in joint management and have been performing the charities and carrying out the mandates of the wakf without room for any complaint. Whileso, respondents 2 to 5 have filed Application No. W.A. 10/B.7/72/Try, before the Board bringing it to the notice of the Board that none of the objects of the wakf were carried out by the respondents to the said application, that the original founder and his sons alone performed the charities, that thereafter, the grand-sons of the founder stopped performing the charities and divided the income of the property among themselves, that there was an attempt on their part to sell also some of the wakf properties, and that the building where the Madarsa was originally conducted has been allowed to become dilapidated and the same was not being used as Madarasa. It was also stated in the said application that the property given under the wakf be worth more than Rs. 2 1/2 lakhs with an annual income of more than Rs. 10, 000/- and that the respondents before the wakf board neither had the wakf registered nor submitted any accounts or paid any contribution to the Board. Consequently, it was prayed that the respondents before the Board be removed from the management, a scheme be framed, the respondents before the Board be directed to furnish accounts and that the management of the wakf be taken over under the control of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board and a Committee constituted for the management of the wakf.

3. The respondents before the Board filed a counter affidavit, while admitting the objects of the wakf as well as the rule of succession referred to by the petitioners before the Board, it was contended that the cash of Rs. 1, 500/- was never handed over to the successors by the wakf on his demise in the year 1939, that the charities were being performed till 1950 by the sons of the wakf, that even during the lifetime of the founder, there was dearth of pupils and the Madarsa was abandoned and not run and the same was never in existence for more than 50 years. it was also contended that there were a number of Madarasas in Aravakurichi and the starting of another one was found to be superfluous and the building now is being used as Musafarkhana for the past many decades, that a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top