SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 662

PRATAP SINGH
S. Prasanna – Appellant
Versus
R. Vijayalakshmi – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:A. Ramesh, K. Ravichandra Babu, Advocates.

Judgment :-

S. PRATAP SINGH J.

The accused in C. C. No. 894 of 1991 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Madras, has filed this petition, under section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records in the aforesaid C. C. No. 894 of 1991 and quash the same. The respondent has filed a private complaint against the petitioner arraying him as the accused. The allegations in it are briefly as follows :

The accused wanted a certain amount as a hand loan. The complainant, agreed and gave a hand loan. The accused promised to return the borrowed amount in stages and parted with post-dated cheques. One of the cheques, dated December 24, 1990, issued by the accused for Rs. 36, 250 was presented for encashment on January 11, 1991. It was returned with an endorsement " account closed " with a bank memo, dated January 18, 1991. The complainant sent a notice through a lawyer on January 19, 1991, to the accused by registered post with acknowledgment due. It was returned with an endorsement " not found " at the delivery time. The accused had deliberately evaded receipt of the registered notice. Hence, the complaint.

The petitioner seeks to quash this complaint.

Mr. A









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top