SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 622

RAJU
Dhirish Traders – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:D.W. Stewart, P. Narasimhan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Writ Petition No. 8054 of 1983 has been filed for a writ of certiorarifiedmandamusto call for the records and to quash the order of the second respondent in S. 30/824/79/ACC, dated 18-5-1983 and consequently direct the second respondent not to enforce the same. The Writ Petition No. 8055 of 1983 has been filed seeking for a writ ofcertiorarito call for and to quash the proceedings No. S. 30/824/79/ACC, dated 23-9-1980.

2.The order impugned in the Writ Petition No. 8054/83 is in effect as against the demand of the writ petitioners and it is unnecessary for me to go into the details to the merits of the claim at this stage having regard to the manner of disposal, I intend to give these writ petitions.

3.It is a matter on record that originally the Assistant Collector passed an order dated 12-2-1980 confirming the demand raised against the petitioners, and that on appeal it came to be set aside by the Appellate Collector of Customs in his proceedings dated 2-5-1980. The Appellate Collector ordered the lower authority, namely, the Assistant Collector tode novoconsider the matter and pass appropriate orders and for that purpose the proceedings have been remanded to the Ass




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top