SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 789

JANARTHANAM, P.S.MISHRA
Pl. Ct. Sp. Subramanian Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi Achi and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates: For

Judgment :-

JANARTHANAM J.

This appeal arises out of an order dated February 10, 1982, by a learned single judge in Application No. 1718 of 1981 in C. S. No. 83 of 1965 on the file of this court C. S. No. 83 of 1965 was one in a partition action of the estate of late Chidambaram Chettiar. Out of seven heirs, one of the heirs, namely, Meenakshi Achi, figuring as plaintiff, brought the said partition action, impleading the rest of the heirs as defendants Nos. 1 to 6. By consent, a preliminary decree had been passed declaring the entitlement of one-seventh share in the said estate to each of them. The estate was burdened with the obligations of meeting the pressing demands of huge arrears of income-tax, wealth-tax, urban land tax, property tax and what not. In order to relieve the pressure on the estate, this court, on April 26, 1977, directed an Advocate-Commissioner to sell two items of immovable properties belonging to the estate, namely, house, ground and premises bearing Nos. 5, 5-A and 5-B, Williams Road, Tiruchirapalli, and a vacant site, known as Kallukuzhi, Tiruchirapalli.

Pursuant to the said orders, the Commissioner invited tenders for the purchase of the said items of the pr

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top