SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 927

MISHRA, SWAMIDURAI
Muniammal and others – Appellant
Versus
Venkitammal and others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:--- For the Respondent:---

Judgment :-

Mishra, J.

Three questions, (1) Whether Ex.A-1 had the character of a testament alone a deed of settlement of rights and interests in the property of the executrix for life her death upon the plaintiffs and the defendants 3 to 5 and the heirs and representative of the deceased daughter of the executrix (defendants 6 to 9)" in O.S.No.156 of 1978 of the court of Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, (2) whether the deed of cancellation (Ex.A-2) is valid and legal in the sense that it cancelled the rights and interests plaintiffs and the defendants 3 to 9 in the suit and (3) whether the suit filed beyond period of three years for a declaration that Ex.A-2 is null and void is maintainable, our consideration in this Letters Patent Appeal.

2. Before we enter into the examination on the above questions, we may state briefly facts. It is the admitted case of the parties that the site or the land in dispute was name of the first defendant acquired under two documents, one dated 19.8.1931 and the other dated 3.6.1932 (Ex.B-2). According to the plaintiffs, the land was acquired the first defendant out of her own funds and the buildings thereon were also put up On 30.11.1970 as per Ex.A-1












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top