SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 31

JANARTHANAM
K. R. Srinathi – Appellant
Versus
H. Ramakrishnan – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:G. Subramanian, Geetha Ramaseshan, Bader Sayeed, T.V. Ramanujam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This is a transfer petition filed by the petitioner-wife under S. 24 of the Code. of Civil Procedure (for short 'Code') for transfer of the proceedings in M. O. P. No. 475 of 1989 on the file of the Family Court, Madras to the file of District Court or Subordinate Court at Coimbatore for disposal according to law,solely on the ground of convenience.

2. The respondent-husband initiated the proceedings before the Family Court, Madras for divorce on the ground of cruelty. The petitioner-wife entered appearance and resisted the proceedings for divorce.

3. The respondent-husband opposed the transfer petition on twin grounds, viz.,

(1) Section 24 of the Code is inapplicable on the face of the sanguine and salutary provisions adumbrated in S. 8 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (for short 'the Act'); and

(2) Even otherwise, the convenience as a ground for transfer should have to be construed as convenience of both the parties and not the convenience of one of the parties alone to the proceedings and in that view of the matter, the balance of convenience will swing in his favour for the continuance of the proceedings in the Family Court at Madras.

4. The edifice of the emergence of the










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top