SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 242

K.M.NATARAJAN, VENKATASWAMY
Perambalur Sugar Mills Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:S. Jagadeesan, S. Palaniswami, C. Pandian, R. Karuppan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

K. M. NATARAJAN, J.

These three revisions, arising out of a common order, are filed by the assessee, namely, Perambalur Sugar Mills Ltd. represented by its Chairman and Managing Director, Madras, challenging the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Madurai, in M.T.A. Nos. 48, 671 and 49 of 1985, respectively. The assessment order is in respect of three assessment years 1980-81, 1981-82 and 1982-83. The value of the disputed turnover is Rs. 7, 07, 878, Rs. 14, 48, 903 and Rs. 15, 55, 878, respectively for the three assessment years.

The short facts which are necessary for the disposal of these revisions are as follows : The assessee contended that the transport charges paid to the third-party lorry owners for transporting sugarcane from the fields of sugarcane growers to the assessee's factory premises are eligible for exemption of tax under rule 6(c) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959, and the same should not be treated as purchase turnover for the purpose of assessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, relying on the observations made in the judgment of the Madras High Court in the case in State of Tamil N






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top