SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 358

A.ABDUL HADI
Vimala Ammal – Appellant
Versus
C. Suseela and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:P. Veeraraghavan, T. Viswanatha Rao, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This Civil Misc. Appeal is against the dismissal order dated 12-1-1990 in E.A. No. 4250 of 1986 in E.P. No. 523 of 1986 in O.S. No. 3244 of 1983 on the file of the Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras. In the said suit in C.S. No.3244 of 1983 the first respondent obtained ex parte decree on 23-3-1984 for a specific performance of Ex.A.58 sale agreement dated 25-10-1982 executed in favour of the first respondent for a sale consideration of Rs. 48, 125/-. The said Ex. A.58 was by the second respondent, the mother, and her children, the respondents 3 to 8.

2. Subsequently to the decree, through E.P. No.2297, 1984 she got the sale deed in her favour and in the abovesaid E.A. No. 523 of 1986 got possession on 7-11-1985 of the property sold, through the court-bailiff. But the appellant has filed the abovesaid E.A. No. 4250 of 1985 under O. 21, R.99 of the Code of Civil Procedure for redelivery of the suit property to her on the ground that she had purchased the said property from the second respondent for Rs. 45, 000/- under the sale deed, Ex. A.12 dated 10-3-1983 itself, even prior to filing of the abovesaid suit on 27-4-1983, that the abovesaid decree could not be execu






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top