NAINAR SUNDARAM, SOMASUNDARAM
Hajee Moosa Sulaiman Sait and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department and others – Respondent
Nainar Sundaram, J.
There are four appeals. The controversy relates to the multi-storeyed constructions that are being done Mr.Abdul Khader Yunus at Door Nos.10 and 11, Haddows Road, Madras. Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram, owner of Door No.16, Pycrofts Garden Road, Madras; Mr.Hajee Sulaiman Sait, owner of Door No.9, Haddows Road, Madras; and Mr.Ponniah, owner of No.12, Pycrofts Garden Road, Madras, all neighbours of Mr. Abdul Khader Yunus, are objecting to the multi constructions of the latter. In view of the scope of the points urged before us, instead doing a filigree or trellis work of the facts of the case in the body of the judgment propose to and we do annex to it copies as per the relevant records made available and they shall speak for themselves. Mr.Abdul Khader Yunus sought permission to multi-storeyed building, consisting of ground floor plus ten floors (residential flats) Nos. 10 and 11, Haddows Road, Madras. The Madras Metropolitan Development Authority, hereinafter, for brevity, called the MMDA, and which is the appropriate planning under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 (Tamil Nadu Act 35 of hereinafter referred to as the Act, by its communicatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.