SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 887

T.SATHIADEV, PADMINI JESUDURAI
Southern Engineering Industries – Appellant
Versus
Supdt. of Central Excise – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:R. Thiagarajan, T. Muthuraman, T. Somasundaram, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Sathiadev, A.CJ.

Appeals under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bakthavatsalam dated 21-9-1989 and made in the exercise of the Spl. Original jurisdiction of the High Court in W.P. numbers 6838/82, 7507/82, 7500/82, 7501/82, 7503/82, 7505/82, 7506/82, 7508/82, 7509/82, 7511/82 and 7513/82 respectively on the file of this Court.

Order: This Writ Appeals coming on for orders as to admission on this day upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the order of the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bakthavatsalam dated 21-9-1989 and made in the exercise of the Special Original Jurisdiction of the High Court in W.P. Nos. 6838/82, -7507/82, 7500/82, 7501/82, 7503/82, 7505/82, 7506/82, 7508/82, 7509/82, 7511/82 and 7513/82 respectively and all ether papers material to these cases and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. R. Thiagarajan for M/s. R. Mohanasundaram and T. Muthuraman, Advocate for the Appellant in each of the Writ Appeals and of Mr. T. Somasundaram, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel on behalf of the respondents in all the Writ Appeals, the Court made the following Order :-

On the learned Single Judge holding that the appellants are having alternat














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top