SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Mad) 30

K.M.NATARAJAN
Gnanasundaram and Another – Appellant
Versus
Murugesa Naicker – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:K. Sampath, M.K. Govindan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful objectors before the lower appellate Court. The facts which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal can be briefly stated as follows :- One Pachiammal sold the property which is the subject matter of this second appeal on 02-11-1967 in favour of the respondent-plaintiff for Rs.7000. At the time of the sale, there was litigation pending in O.S. 523 of 1962 under which Pachiammal filed the suit against one Veerappa Asari and Nataraja Asari (father of the appellant) for a declaration of title and for recovery of possession. The said proceeding ended in compromise in S.A. 1175 of 1966 on 25-6-1970 between Pachiammal and the appellants' father and brother. As per the said compromise deed, Pachiammal's title was declared in respect of the said property. According to the respondent-plaintiff, by virtue of the sale deed dt. 02-11-1967, executed by Pachiammal, he is entitled to the property and his title was affirmed by the compromise decree and he stepped into the shoes of Pachiammal. Hence, he filed the execution petition on 11-10-1981, for delivery of possession in execution of the decree in O.S. 523 of 1962. The appellants herei












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top