SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Mad) 516

SATHIADEV
T. Savariraj Pillai – Appellant
Versus
R. S. S. Vastrad and Company – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:E. Padmanabhan, T.R. Rajagopalan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Defendant in O.S. No.1293 of 1984 on the file of II Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli is the petitioner. Plaintiff is the sole respondent. Plaintiff filed the suit based on equitable mortgage and for other reliefs, and at the stage when defendant was examined as D. W. 1, he filed I. A. No.466 of 1987 under O.23, R. 1(3) and S.151, Civil P.C. seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit in respect of the subject-matter of the present suit. The suit was filed by M/s. R.S.S. Vashtrad an Company through one of its partners M.M. Nalavad. He had sworn to before Court that he had filed Exhibit A-2 partnership deed to show that he is a partner of the plaintiff firm even prior to 10-10-1983, but, however, this fact was not intimated to the Registrar of Firms by the Auditor of the Firm, and that entry had been made in the Register only during the pendency of the suit, and therefore, it being a formal defect, which would not go into the root of the matter, he had been advised to file a fresh suit, and therefore, he sought for permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.

2. This was opposed by defendant claiming that it i













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top