SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 71

DAVID ANNOUSSAMY, S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN
M. A. Brosh Nainar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:B. Kumar, G. R. Edmund, Advocates.

Judgment :-

PANDIAN J.

This writ petition is field by one Brosh Nainar under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issue of a writ of habeas corpus quashing the order of detention passed by the respondent, namely, State of Tamil Nadu, against the petitioner's brother by name Nainar Khaja Mohideen alias Haja Mohideen alias Sultan Basheer and setting him at liberty.

2. The impugned order of detention was passed by the detaining authority in exercise of the powers conferred by S. 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act 1974 (Central Act 52 of 1974) with a view to preventing the detenu from smuggling goods and the detenu was directed to be detained and kept in the custody in the Central Prison, Madurai

3. The brief facts as set out in the grounds of detention which necessitated the passing of the order of detention are as follows :-

On 29/30-5-1985 at about 1.15 a.m. the detenu arrived as a passenger by Indian Airlines flight and was cleared on oral declaration. He paid his customs duty but he was intercepted at the exist gate by an intelligence officer of the Customs and he was taken for re-examination on a reasonable belief





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top