SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 176

PADMINI JESUDURAI
L. Balu – Appellant
Versus
Periasami and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:T.D. Vasu, N. Sivamani, S. Jagadeesan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The above revision by the judgement-debtor is directed against the order passed by the II Additional Subrodinate Judge, Salem in E.P. 67 of 1984 in O.S. 143 of 1981, confirming the sale in respect of Itmes 2 and 3, on the ground that the sale of these items amounted to excessive execution being in violation of O.21, R.64, C.P.C.

2. The first respondent filed O.S. 143 of 1981 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Salem, against the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3 for recovery of a sum of Rs. 99,275 with future interest. The suit was decreed. The first respondent field E.P. 67 of 1984 under O.21, Rr.43, 64, 66 and 68, C.P.C. in respect of three items of properties. Items 1 and 2 were immoveable properties, while Item 3 was the negative print of a Tamil film with sound track. The value of the first item was shown in the E.P. as Rs. 30,000, the second item as Rs. 30,000, and the third item as Rs. 10,000. The execution petition was for a sum of Rs. 1,37,425. During the pendency of the execution petition, the petitioner had paid a sum of Rs. 30,000 making the balance to be realised as Rs. 1,07,425. All the three items were brought for sale. Item 1 was sold for Rs. 1,15,000.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top