SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 136

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. N. CHANDURKAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SRINIVASAN
K. Anbazhagan and Others - Appellant
Versus
The Secretary, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, Madras, and Others - Respondent
Case No : Writ Petn. Nos. 14189 of 1986 and 493, 505, 513, 523 857, 858, 932, 1105 to 1107 and 1346 of 1987
Decided On : 16 April 1987

Advocates Appeared:V.P. Raman, M.N. Raghavan, Pathy Sundaram, K.P. Krishnasheety, Mohan Prasaran, N. Ganapathy For K.R. Thamizhmani, Selwaraj Julian, R. Amarnath, D. Raju, P.S. Raman, V. Ravi, M. Kalyanasundaram, K. Ganesan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

M. N. CHANDURKAR (C J)

The petitioners in all these Writ Petitions are members of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. The Tamil Nadu legislative Assembly passed resolution on 22nd December, 1986 declaring that the petitioners were unfit to continue as members of the House and that they were expelled from the membership of the House and that they could not continue to be members of the House. It was further resolved that their seats became vacant. The resolution passed by the Assembly was on a motion moved by the Leader of the House. The English translation of the resolution original of which was in Tamil as adopted by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly on 22nd December, 1986 as published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary of the same date, reads as follows :-

"Whereas the Executive Committee of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam resolved in its meeting held on 9th November, 1986 at Coimbatore that the portion of Part XVII of the Constitution of India which provides for Hindi to be the Official Language of the Union should be burnt in Public meetings, to be held between the period commencing on 17th November, 1986 and ending with 17th December, 1986 in various places in the State and it has been publicized in newspapers and public meetings that Constitution burning agitation will be carried on.

And whereas in pursuance of the above said resolution, some members of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party have burnt in public place a copy of a part of the Constitution of India (such part being a document or paper containing excerpts being either in writing or printing or in any other mode of representation or reproduction in a visible form :

And Whereas in pursuance of the above said resolution, the following Members of the Legislative Assembly belonging to Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam have burnt in public place (on the dates specified against them) a copy of the part of the Constitution of India (such part) being a document or paper containing excerpts of the whole or any part of any Article of the Constitution of India, such excerpts being either in writing, or printing or in any other mode of representation or reproduction in a visible form :

1. Thiru K. Anbazhagan - 17th November,1986

2. Thiru S. Balan - 17th November,1986

3. Thiru A. Selvarasan - 17th November,1986

4. Thiru P. Ponnurangam - 17th November,1986

5. Thiru Parithi Elamvazhuthi - 17th November,1986

6. Thiru M. Ramanathan - 19th November,1986

7. Thiru R. Chinnasamy - 23rd November,1986

8. Thiru M. Abragham - 29th November,1986

9. Thiru C. Arumugam - 29th November,1986

10. Thiru V.K. Raju - 5th December, 1986

And whereas the abovesaid conduct of the abovementioned members of this House, apart from being an act of violation of the oath or affirmation made and subscribed as Members bearing true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India under Article 188 of the Constitution of India read with R.4(1) of the Legislative Assembly Rules, is also lowering the regard for the Constitution, the regard for this House constituted by it and the regard which a member of this House should have; and is also derogatory to the dignity of the Constitution as well as the dignity of this House and wholly inconsistent with the standards which this House expects from its Members, this House therefore considers that the abovementioned Members of this House are unfit to be Members of this House on account of their abovesaid conduct.

This House after careful consideration resolves that the following Members of this House, viz., :-

1. Thiru K. Anbazhagan,

2. Thiru S. Balan,

3. Thiru A. Selvarasan,

4. Thiru P. Ponnurangam,

5. Thiru Parithi Elamvazhuth,

6. Thiru M. Ramanathan,

7. Thiru R. Chinnasamy,

8. Thiru M. Abragham,

9. Thiru C. Arumugam,

10. Thiru V.K. Raju,

are unfit to continue as Members of this House and also resolves that they are expelled from the membership of this House and that they cannot continue to be members of this House and it further resolves that their seats becomes vacant.



































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top