SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Mad) 310

RAMALINGAM
C. M. Visalakshi and Others – Appellant
Versus
K. Kuppusamy and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:K. Sengotian, Advocate.

Judgment :-

Applicants 1 to 4 who are plaintiffs 2 to 5 in CS. 251/87 have filed this application under S.32 of the Advocates Act read with Order XIV, Rule 8 of the O.S. Rules, seeking permission for Mr. A.V. Raman a family friend and Power of Attorney Agent of the Plaintiffs, to appear and plead on their behalf in the suit, under the following circumstances :

2. Sethulakshmi, the sole respondent herein, is the second defendant in the suit. She filed O.S. No. 1681/67 on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras, against one C.M. Balusamy, first plaintiff in the suit, for declaration of certain property described in 'B' Schedule to the plaint. She also asked for delivery of possession of portions of properties marked as red and green forming part of 'B' Schedule property and for other consequential reliefs. The suit was decreed as prayed for and the appeal, AS. 7/75 filed by Balusamy was dismissed on 21-10-1975. The second appeal, SA. 510/76 preferred by him was also dismissed on 18-11-1977. Sethulakshmi filed EP. 259/78 on 24-1-78 to execute the decree. The legal representatives of the judgment-debtor, Balusamy, obstructed delivery of possession. Sethulakshmi filed EA. 3497/81 for re











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top