SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Mad) 49

NATARAJAN, NAINAR SUNDARAM
Special Officer of The Management of T. U. C. S. Limited Madras-5 – Appellant
Versus
S. Loganathan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For

Judgment :-

Nainar Sundaram, J.

These Writ Appeals are against a common order in Writ Petitions Nos. 1742 and 1743 of 1982. The first- respondent in the Writ Petitions is the appellant in the Writ Appeals. The petitioner in each of the Writ Petitions is the first-respondent in the respective Writ Appeals. The second-respondent in the Writ Petitions is the second-respondent in the Writ Appeals. For the sake of convenience, we shall refer to the parties as they stood arrayed in the Writ Petitions.

2. An industrial dispute between the T.U.C.S. Employees' Union and the first-respondent relating to wage increase, wastage, driage and spillage allowance and non-employment of certain workmen was conciliated before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-I, Madras. It is to be noted that the two petitioners were amongst the workmen non- employed by the first respondent. There was a settlement on 2nd July, 1977 under S. 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. While the other issues were settled in the real sense, terms were mutually arrived at between the parties and a quietus was given to such issues, with regard to the dispute relating to on-employment of



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top