SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 110

NATARAJAN
Chanda Paints (Madras) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commercial Tax Officer, Royapettah Assessment Circle, Madras-5 – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:C. Natarajan, R. Lokapriya, Advocates.

Judgment :-

NATARAJAN, J.

After hearing the Government Advocate (Commercial Taxes), pursuant to the notice of motion given on 28th September, 1984, the writ petition is admitted and having regard to the limited nature of the prayer, the writ petition itself is taken up today for final disposal by consent of both sides.

2. The short question for consideration is, whether the petitioner, who has registered itself, under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, is entitled to the supply of C forms and declarations, on request for the supply of such forms being made or whether the respondent is entitled to refuse to supply such forms on the ground that the materials to be bought from other States by use of such C forms, would be utilised in works contracts or defer the issue of such forms on the ground that a thorough investigation is to be made regarding the nature of the transaction carried on by the petitioner.

3. An identical question came up for consideration before a Bench of this Court in W.P. Nos. 1379 and 1380 of 1967 and 840 of 1971 (T. V. P. Nambiar v. State of Madras) and by order dated 27th April, 1971, the Bench held as follows :

"We are of the view that the petition is w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top