SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 219

DAVID ANNOUSSAMY
Raja – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:T. Sudanthiram, A. N. Rajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This is an appeal by the accused against conviction and sentence. The case of the prosecution was as follows.

On 25-6-1982 at about 8-30 p.m. near the bus stand at Jeeva Park, Madras, P.W. 1 found himself alone. The accused came near him, showed him a knife and asked him to part with money he had in his pocket. Before P.W. 1 did anything, the accused put his hand in the pocket and drew out P.W. 1's money purse. Upon P.W. 1 shouting 'thief, thief', P.W. 2 came to his rescue. The accused was caught. His hands were tied with the help of a kerchief. He was taken to the police station.

2. Thereupon the accused was prosecuted for offences under sections 392 and 397, I.P.C. He was found guilty thereunder and sentenced concurrently to seven years of rigorous imprisonment. It is against that judgment that the present appeal has been preferred.

Learned counsel for the accused would fairly admit the facts of the case but would contend that they only amount to an offence under S. 392, I.P.C. He therefore does not attack the conviction under that section; but contends that there is no material whatsoever for convicting the accused for an offence under sections 397, I.P.C. This is the p






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top