SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 331

S.A.KADER
Janaki and Others – Appellant
Versus
Prabath Finance By Partner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:S. V. Jayaraman, T. R. Natarajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The revision is against the order of the District Munsif of Salem in E. P. No. 663 of 1981 in O.S. No. 1163 of 1978. The judgment debtors-respondents in the execution petition are the revision petitioners.

2. The respondent herein obtained a decree for money against one Chandramouli and the second respondent in the execution petition. The ,said Chandramouli died subsequently in a motor vehicle accident and the revision petitioners are his heirs and legal representatives. In M.A.C.A. 3 of 1981 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem, compensation has been awarded to the revision petitioners in respect of the death of late Chandramouli. The respondent filed the execution petition in execution of his decree in O.S.1163 of 1978 and sought attachment of the amount of compensation awarded to the revision petitioners on account of the death of the late Chandramouli. The respondents objected to the attachment; but, the learned District Munsif overruled the objection and ordered attachment. Hence this revision.

3. The contention of the revision petitioners is that the amount of compensation awarded for the death of a person is not liable to be attached in execution o



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top