SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Mad) 137

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN
Chief Engineer (Personnel) Tneb Madras - Appellant
Versus
K. Raman - Respondent
Case No : W.A. No. 244 and 245 of 1984
Decided On : 04 April 1984

Advocates Appeared: For

Confirmation of the order of transfer on appeal.

Headnote:Service Law-Misconduct-Lack of co-operation on the part of officials of Electricity Board in investigation by police in to allegation of theft of energy-Disciplinary action initiated and officials transferred-Order of transfer challenged-Order to transfer confirmed on appeal.

       

Judgment :-

Mohan, J.

These two writ appeals are directed against the orders in W.P. Nos. 10089 and 10090 of 1983. The respondent in W.A. No. 244 of 1984 is K. Raman, Assistant Divisional Engineer in M.R.T. The respondent in W.A. No. 245 of 1984 is A. P. Ramasamy, Divisional Engineer in M.R.T. "M.R.T." is the abbreviation of Meter Relay Testing. 2. The short facts leading to the writ appeals are as follows :- A case of theft of electrical energy to the tune of Rs. 2, 41, 406/- at Messrs. Crystal Ice Factory, Guindy, Madras was noticed on 26th May, 1983. A complaint was lodged by the Chief Engineer (Personnel), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Madras with the police concerning this theft. The police initiated investigation. In the course of such investigation, meters with seals similar to those tested on 13th November, 1975, 11th November, 1975 and 12th March, 1976 were required by the police. That was with a view to cross-check with the seals concerned in the case of theft of energy. On 9th June, 1983, the Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board addressed a letter to the Sub-Inspector of Police, Guindy, Madras with copies marked to Raman, the respondent in W.A. No. 244 of 1984. Inter alia, it was stated therein as to the modus operandi that could be adopted to trace the specimen seals. There was also a note to the said respondent as the sub-Inspector of Police, Guindy, in the manner set out therein. On 26th July, 1983 Raman wrote to the Vigilance Cell of the Board with a copy to Ramasamy, the respondent in W.A. No. 245 of 1984. In that letter it was stated that the concerned meters were not easily traceable. Difficulties even with regard to the tracing of test records were also pointed out in that letter. On 9th August, 1983, the Inspector General of Police and Chief Vigilance Officer of the Board wrote to the Superintending Engineer (Distribution), Madras Electricity System (South), Madras-2, complaining that the investigation was unnecessarily pending for want of co-operation from Raman. He further wanted instructions to be issued to Raman to trace the test records. This letter may now be extracted :Copy of letter No. 10931/V.C. 10/83-5, dated 9th August, 1983, from the Inspector-General of Police & Vigilance Officer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Madras-600 002, addressed to the Superintending Engineer (Distribution)/Madras Electricity System (South), Madras-600 002.

Sub : Theft of energy at Guindy - Industrial Estate - M/s. Crystal Ice Factory - Reg.

Ref : This office letter No. 10931/VC7/83-3, dated 28th June, 1983.

As already informed to you in the letter cited the case relating to Guindy Police Station, Crime No. 401/83 theft of energy to the tune of Rs. 2, 41, 406/- at M/s. Crystal Ice Factory, Guindy, is pending investigation unnecessarily for want of co-operation from the A.D.E./M.R.T./South. The meter Nos. (1) Remco 354768 (2) Remco 492551 and (3) 512019 concerned in these cases were tested on 13th November, 1975, 11th November, 1975 and 12th March, 1976 respectively. In his instructions dated 9th June, 1983 the Additional S.P. while giving instructions to the S.I. of Police/Guindy, marked a copy of the same to the A.D.E./M.R.T./South. In this case, the test record along with the specimen M.R.T. Seals and the meters concerned are most essential to prove the case. Unless the specimen M.R.T. seals are sent to the Forensic Science Lab. for comparison, the Police will not be able to come to a definite conclusion in the case and take further action. The A.D.E/M.R.T./South in his letter No. ADR/MR/S.F. 18/D. 615/83, dated 26th July, 1983 has addressed the Vigilance Cell and copy of the same is enclosed. It is not known as to why the A.D.E. wrote this letter to the Vigilance Cell when there were specific instructions from the Addl. S.P./Vigilance in connection with this case. In his letter he has stated that there were five sealing pliers out of which two were handed over to M.R.T./North durin






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top