SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Mad) 350

K.M.NATARAJAN
M. Muthuswamy – Appellant
Versus
Special Police Establishment – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Sriramulu, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This petition has been filed by A-1 in C.C. No. 92 of 1982 on the file of the C.J.M., Madurai, to quash the said proceedings.

2. The respondent viz, State represented by the Inspector of Police, S.P.E., C.B.I., Madras, laid chargesheet against the petitioner and five others for offences under Ss. 120-B, 193, 418, 419, 467, 471 read with 467 and 384 I.P.C. The allegations on the basis of which the above charges were made are as follows. A-1 is a practising Advocate at Usilampatti A-2 is also an Advocate, practising at Madurai, A-3 is a teacher in the R. C. Primary School, Sempatti, Usilampatti. A-4 is A-1's father-in-law. A-6 is a henchman of A-1. All are close associates. During 1977-78, Accused 1 to 6 were parties to a criminal conspiracy to cheat the Indian Overseas Bank, Palace Road, Madurai, and the heirs of late Sri Sadra of Chettipatti in Usilampatti Taluk, in order to acquire the proceeds of the Bank accounts of late Sri Sadra by false personation and committing forgery.

3. Sadra worked in Malaysia, saved Rs. 1, 52, 790.30 and transferred it to Indian Overseas Bank, Main Branch, Palace Road, Madurai, investing a major portion in three fixed deposit receipts and the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top