SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Mad) 155

SHANMUGAM, RAMANUJAM
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
A. K. Sundaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:K. S. Bakthavatsalam, Advocate.

Judgment :-

RAMANUJAM, J.

The only question that arises for consideration in this tax case filed by the revenue is, whether arrow-root powder sold by the assessee would fall under item 103(viii) of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, which is as follows :

"103(viii) Foods including preparations of vegetables, fruits, milk, cereals, flour, starch, birds, eggs, meat and meat offals, animals blood, fish, crustaceans and molluscs which -

(a) are sold under any brand name registered under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (Central Act 43 of 1958); and

(b) do not fall under item 24."

According to the revenue arrow-root powder would fall either under" food"or under" preparation of vegetables" *

. The Tribunal has held that arrow-root powder is neither an item of food nor is it a preparation of vegetables, that the arrow-root powder is generally consumed by people who are ill, particularly those suffering from diarrhoea or similar diseases and that therefore it cannot be taken to be an article of food.

In Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax v. R. Viswambharan, the Kerala High Court has held that arrow-root is a vegetable. But the question here is, whether arrow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top