SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Mad) 177

SHANMUGAM, RAMANUJAM
P. Hajee Mohamed Saliah and Company – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Azeez Pasha, Advocate.

Judgment :-

RAMANUJAM, J.

The only point canvassed in this tax case is as to whether the revisional authority functioning under Section 32 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, has the power to revise and refix the taxable turnover. According to the learned counsel for the assessee, the revisional authority acting under section 32, if he comes to the conclusion that the order passed by the subordinate authority is erroneous, can only remit the matter to the lower authority, for a fresh determination of taxable turnover and he has no power to modify the order of the assessing authority and himself refix the turnover. For appreciating the said contention it is necessary to refer to the relevant facts as also the relevant statutory provisions.

The assessees in this case are tanners and dealers in hides and skins and tanning materials. The assessee-company returned a total and taxable turnover of Rs. 5, 32, 999 for the assessment year 1975-76 in their form A-2 return. However, the correct total turnover as per the books of account was found by the assessing authority to be Rs. 29, 59, 354.90. The assessee claimed exemption in respect of turnover of Rs. 4, 72, 115.44, being the t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top