SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Mad) 245

M.N.MOORTHY
Chinnu Naicken – Appellant
Versus
Rangasami – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:T. S. Arunachalam, N. Dhinakar, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This is a petition filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. to set aside the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, clubbing S.C. Nos. 59 and 60 of 1979 on his file.

2. For an incident that took place on 21-4-1978 in Akkampalayan village, a charge sheet was filed in S.C. No. 59 of 1981 the first accused being the Vendikkara Muthu Naicken who is dead and fifteen other accused. Regarding the same incident Chinnammal, wife of the deceased preferred a complaint against seventeen persons which is the subject matter of S.C. No. 60 of 1981. Vendikkara Muthu Naicken who is an accused in S.C. No. 59 of 1979 is also an accused in S.C. No. 60 of 1981. On account of his death there are 16 accused in S.C. No. 60 of 1979. Except one Kondappan who is A-9 in S.C. No. 59 of 1979 all others are included as accused in S.C. No. 60 of 1979. A-9 Chinnu Naicken and A-10 Rangasamy in S.C. No. 60 of 1979 are not the accused in the other case and the rest of the accused are common in both the cases.

3. A petition was filed by the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State before the learned Additional Sessions Judge for making Accused 9 and 10 in S.C. No. 60 of 1979 as Accused 16 and 17 in









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top